Germany Reputation Radar 2026

What the Global South thinks about German foreign policy

More information
Cover of the Germany Reputation Radar 2026 featuring a gray world map. The 30 countries where surveys were conducted are marked in turquoise, and Germany is highlighted in yellow.
Creator: FES

Germany’s political capital in the Global South is an underused asset

Germany today is taking an unsparingly critical look at itself. Berlin is discussing its economic weaknesses, loss of international significance and dwindling influence. The view from outside, however, is strikingly different. The Germany Reputation Radar 2026 shows that Germany’s international standing is far stronger than the German debate would suggest.

Germany’s particular advantage does not lie merely in its good reputation. Among the international actors compared here, no other country combines favourability and perceived competence as strongly as the Federal Republic. Although China is regarded as even more capable, it is much less well liked. Germany, by contrast, combines both respect and goodwill.

This reputation goes hand in hand with a clear expectation, namely that Germany should play an active, autonomous foreign policy role and take on more responsibility, not less, in the international arena. This autonomy also has a geopolitical dimension: leaning too close to the United States and a Washington-led world order finds much less positive resonance among respondents than closer ties with China. Nevertheless, most people still favour strong transatlantic relations. This does not entail turning away from the West. What respondents really want is a Germany that does not confuse partnership with allegiance.

Indeed, it is at this point that Germany’s reputational edge comes up against its limits. There is no majority support in the countries we investigated for German policy on either the war in Ukraine or the Middle East conflict. It is precisely where Germany could most readily translate its standing into a mediating, constructive role that its political capital has so far remained unused. Just because Germany is well liked does not mean that people are convinced by its policies.

Key findings

Publications

Germany Reputation Radar 2026

what the Global South thinks about German foreign policy - results of a population survey conducted in 30 countries

Farren, Diego ; Schneider, Marcus ; Richter, Thomas ; Bach, Elisabeth von ; Basedau, Matthias ; List, Ludwig ; Plagemann, Johannes ; Starke, Clemens ; Voß, Hanna | Bonn : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, November 2026

Germany Reputation Radar 2026: what the Global South thinks about German foreign policy

Factsheet

[Bonn] : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, November 2026

Key findings

Among the countries compared, Germany is the most popular in the Global South. The Federal Republic is perceived as both competent and congenial, a combination that no other country can match. Only China is regarded as more competent, but it is considerably less well liked.

Germany’s reputation has a strong economic and technological basis: some 91.4 per cent regard it as economically strong, 88.8 per cent as a leader in science and technology. With regard to the foreign policy debate this means that Germany’s international capital still depends to a large extent on economic performance.

While Germans continue to fret about their own decline, in the countries under investigation the Federal Republic is overwhelmingly regarded as a rising star. Only China’s future is viewed more optimistically.

Respondents clearly want closer cooperation with Germany and more German involvement for peace, diplomacy and a multipolar world. The contrast with the domestic mood is stark: as the FES Security Radar shows, many Germans would themselves prefer Germany to play a smaller leadership role in European policy – not less international involvement overall, but no stronger leadership within the EU either – while partners in the Global South by contrast want more German initiative. Politically, this raises the question of whether Germany is both willing and, domestically, in a position to adopt the role that has been allotted to it from outside.

However, more German involvement does not mean merely foreign-policy business as usual, according to many respondents. What they would prefer is a more autonomous Germany in a multipolar world, at more of a distance from the United States, more cooperation with China and recognition of Palestine. What is particularly striking here is that these positions in part chime more with those of the German population than with the foreign policy actually being pursued by Germany. The key discrepancy therefore lies not so much between Germany and the Global South as between the expectations of their respective populations and the German Government’s foreign policy.

Germany’s good reputation does not automatically underpin its foreign policy. There is no majority support for German policy on either Ukraine or the Middle East. There is a particularly strong desire for a correction in relation to the Middle East conflict: two thirds of people want Germany to take Palestinian interests more strongly into account. With regard to Ukraine the picture is more nuanced: 59.5 per cent are in favour of taking Ukrainian interests more strongly into account, 49.9 per cent Russian interests – a balance in favour of Ukraine, but respondents cannot be divided simply into camps. According to the FES Security Radar, Germans themselves would prefer to end the war quickly, even at the expense of Ukrainian territory. German public opinion on these issues is thus closer to the expectations of the Global South.

What often matters is less whether Germany takes a position than how it communicates it: if Germany favours one side over the other, it does so at the expense of a visible loss of trust, especially in Muslim-majority countries, such as Indonesia, Turkey and Morocco. If it credibly commits itself to a two-state solution, however, its image remains positive. Gaza has thus not damaged Germany’s reputation across the board, but selectively at a regional level.

The strongest social link in the study is proximity to Germany: respondents with several points of contact rate Germany as much more congenial and competent and also exhibit more sympathy with German foreign policy than those without such contacts. This demonstrates the relational capital bound up with Germany’s personal and institutional presence. Overall, Germany’s reputation has survived the Gaza war, and there is no evidence of a general loss of trust. Its basic reputation remains robust, but not invulnerable: how people look at Germany depends strongly on the particular national and political context.

Results by region

No uniform pattern: in Vietnam the economy and development are particularly prominent, at 33.7 per cent, while in Bangladesh football and sport play an unusually large role. Germany’s favourability advantage is particularly evident here, for example in India, where 62.2 per cent rate Germany positively, as against 38.2 per cent for the United States and 28.1 per cent for China.

Historical references are particularly visible here: in Argentina, Brazil and Chile around a quarter of respondents or more spontaneously mentioned the world wars or the Holocaust when thinking of Germany. On favourability, Germany is well ahead of China and the United States, for example in Chile (52.8 per cent), Colombia (55.0 per cent) and Mexico (56.8 per cent). According to the AMLAT Radar 2026, however, Germany’s standing in the region has declined slightly since 2022, while China has gained ground as a development model. Germany nevertheless remains among the highest-rated countries.

The region shows the widest range: Germany scores very well on favourability in Tunisia (69.5 per cent), Morocco (66.6 per cent) and Syria (71.5 per cent). Israel marks the major exception: there, references to the world wars and the Holocaust, at 45.2 per cent, shape the image of Germany much more strongly than in any other survey country. On favourability, too, Germany, with 31.7 per cent, is well behind the United States (58.9 per cent).

The different national profiles are particularly diverse: in Namibia colonialism is the most prominent spontaneous association, at 27.9 per cent – a finding that reflects the two nations’ particular shared history. On competence, China, Germany and the United States all achieve comparatively high ratings in the region; on favourability, Germany is well ahead, for example in Kenya (65.8 per cent) and Tanzania (71.4 per cent).

Authors

  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Diego Farren

    Dr Diego Farren

    Dr Diego Farren is a Research Fellow at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA). He makes extensive use of public opinion surveys and quantitative methods in his work as a sociologist and criminologist.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Marcus Schneider

    Marcus Schneider

    Marcus Schneider heads the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s (FES) Regional Project for Peace and Security in the Middle East, as well as the country portfolios for Syria and Iran, in Beirut.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Prof. Dr. Thomas Richter

    Prof. Dr Thomas Richter

    Prof. Dr Thomas Richter is Lead Research Fellow at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA), where he heads the research cluster “Political Accountability and Participation”. He is also honorary professor at Leuphana University Lüneburg.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Elisabeth von Bach

    Elisabeth von Bach

    Elisabeth von Bach is Programme Manager at the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s Competence Centre for Peace and Security in the Middle East and North Africa, based in Nicosia. Her work focuses on regional cooperation and dialogue processes. She coordinated the study Germany Reputation Radar 2026.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Prof. Dr. Matthias Basedau

    Prof. Dr Matthias Basedau

    Prof. Dr Matthias Basedau is Director of the GIGA Institute for African Studies and a §17 Professor of Political Science at the University of Hamburg.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Dr. Ludwig List

    Dr Ludwig List

    Dr Ludwig List is an economist and Senior Researcher at the Vienna office of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, where he conducts research on democratisation and political participation. He holds a PhD in economic inequality and now lectures on the subject.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Dr. Johannes Plagemann

    Dr Johannes Plagemann

    Dr Johannes Plagemann is a Senior Research Fellow at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA).


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Clemens Starke

    Clemens Starke

    Clemens Starke is Programme Manager at the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s Competence Centre on Peace and Security in the Middle East and N in Beirut. His work focuses on regional geopolitics, the role of China and the Gulf region.


  • [Translate to English:] Portrait von Hanna Voß

    Hanna Voß

    Hanna Voß studied political science and journalism. After several years working as a newspaper and magazine editor, she joined the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in 2022.


About the study

The Germany Reputation Radar 2026 was designed and analysed by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in cooperation with the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA). It is based on a comparative public opinion survey of 25,692 respondents across 30 countries in Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Colombia, Mexico, DR Congo, Kenya, Namibia, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Vietnam, Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Israel, Palestine, Syria and Turkey. Data collection was carried out by the market and opinion research institute Ipsos. Fieldwork took place between 21 May and 20 July 2026.

The study examines two dimensions. First, what image people have of Germany and how Germany compares with China, the United States and other international actors in terms of favourability and competence. Second, how respondents evaluate Germany’s international role and its concrete foreign policy positions, with a particular focus on Russia’s war against Ukraine and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. In addition, a randomised survey experiment conducted in 27 countries tests whether, and to what extent, different communication messages from the German government on the Middle East conflict influence evaluations of Germany in the short term. One message focuses on a two-state solution, the other on support for Israel’s existence and security.

The term “Global South” does not refer to a homogeneous political, economic or societal grouping. The study uses it as an analytical frame of reference for a comparative look at states and societies outside the political centres of power in Europe and North America. It does not assume that the societies surveyed share the same interests or standpoints. Cross-country results should therefore be interpreted as the average across the countries surveyed, not as the population-weighted opinion of all people in the Global South.

The Germany Reputation Radar 2026 complements two other international surveys conducted by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: the FES Security Radar 2025, an examination of geopolitical and security policy attitudes in the OSCE region, and the AMLAT Radar 2026, a survey of Latin American perspectives on current international developments. The report draws on both studies to put its findings into context, for example when comparing external perceptions of Germany with Germans’ perceptions of their own country.

Contact

Competence Centre for Peace and Security in MENA

Middle East and North Africa Department

Press / Department for Communications

Our partner

You might also be interested in

Large metal-lattice globe sculpture backlit by the sun in front of a modern building complex, with cars passing by.
Creator: shutterstock.com / realyamcha

Global South: Definition, History & Issues

What does the term “Global South” mean, and which countries does it encompass? An overview of the term’s historical origins, global inequalities, and the political, economic, and societal challenges.

Banner of the Security Radar 2025 with glowing, interwoven fibres against a dark red background.
Creator: FES / Florian Müller

Security Radar 2025 – Europe: Lost in Geopolitics

How do people in Europe and beyond perceive current geopolitical challenges and security threats? The FES-Security Radar 2025 explores public attitudes towards war, peace, and Europe’s role in a changing world order.

A map of the continent of South America on a blue-turquoise background, showing lines of longitude and latitude.
Creator: FES

AMLAT Radar 2026 – Latin American Perspectives on Europe and the World

How do people in Latin America view Europe and the world? The FES-AMLAT Radar 2026 explores Latin American perspectives on international relations, global power shifts, and Europe’s role in an increasingly uncertain world order.

Flags of various countries flying on flagpoles against a blue sky.
Creator: shutterstock.com / Shawn.ccf

FES International – International work of the FES

How does the FES promote social justice, democracy, peace, and security around the world? An insight into its international work, global network, and cooperation with political actors and trade unions.

back to top