| | |
In 1999 the EU states took the decision to commence negotiations with Turkey on
the possibility of EU accession. The wisdom and appropriacy of accession are still
subject to violent disagreement in the EU, while in Turkey the swell of critical
voices is rising. And it isn’t as if these are accession negotiations – rather a kind of
preliminary »sounding out,« likely to last around 10 to 15 years, in an attempt to
make out whether Turkey really is in a position to become a full EU member.
This procedure was agreed upon by the EU states in 1999, although in 1997
they had clearly pronounced against accession negotiations with Turkey.
Obviously
the decision of 1999 was intended to relieve the pressure constantly being
exerted by the USA in favor of Turkish EU entry. At the same time, the EU member
states had no wish to commit themselves. The resulting aimless and contradictory
conflict situation has on both sides led to enormous and dubious repression of
important facts likely to block Turkish accession. On the European side these
include in the first place the fact that all the relevant eu treaties stipulate that
accession is permissible exclusively to »European states,« and no one has so far
seriously asserted that Turkey is a European state. An accession agreement with
Turkey or even concrete negotiations on that subject would not get past the
European Court of Justice.
Add to that the neglect of geopolitical realities. On the Turkish side no notice
is being taken of such historical, political and politico-religious facts as »human
and civil rights,« »nationalism,« »Islamization,« »Armenians« and »Kurds.« The
significance that these topics have for Europeans in relation to Turkish accession
is also being underestimated. Finally, both sides are avoiding the question of
whether the current mutual sounding out process can manage in 10 to 15 years
what could not be managed by Turkish politics and culture in the last 80 years.
Both sides would do well to find a way of extracting themselves from the unfortunate
fixation on »Turkish accession: yes or no?« – it can only harm them both.
|