| | |
The ballistic missile defense (BMD) project is intended to protect the territory of
the United States, as well as us overseas facilities and allies against future threats
emerging from so-called rogue regimes. The European components of this BMD
system, which will probably be deployed in Poland and the Czech Republic, are
conceptualized against the threat of future Iranian long-range ballistic missiles
armed with nuclear weapons. Besides profound uncertainties in regard to the
materialization of this threat, however, us strategic missile defense may have a
negative impact on the strategic relationship between Russia and the United
States.
The Russian Federation will have to drastically reduce its arsenal of strategic
nuclear weapons and will not be able to compensate necessary reductions of
outdated weapon systems. Moreover, land-based systems will continue to constitute
the backbone of Russia’s strategic nuclear forces. Moscow is troubled by
the deployment and possible future modernization of BMD components in Eastern
Europe, which could increase the vulnerability of Russia’s land-based strategic
forces and therefore – in the long term – undermine its second-strike capability.
This fear of a possible us strategic advantage is further fueled by the expiration of
start i, which will put an end to the verification of bilateral disarmament.
In this context, the deployment of irbms, which are currently prohibited by
the inf Treaty, could be a suitable countermeasure. This type of missile would
enable Russia to asymmetrically maintain the strategic balance, as well as to
counter future threats emerging on its southern and south-eastern flank.
Apart from this strategic dimension, Russia’s fierce reaction to Washington’s
deployment plans in Eastern Europe is also the consequence of us hegemonic
arrogance. In the course of the 1990s, the United States refrained from a cooperative
approach and has ever since set the tone of the bilateral strategic arms
control process. After a decade of paralysis, the Russian Federation now seems to
have decided to confront us arrogance and dominance in the field of arms control.
|